~ vaccine!
medical madness
The U.S. (wrongly called “America”) is a society where for many years mistakes were made. These pervasive mistakes extended into the society's intellectual and cultural life. They did not get corrected, but they did not go unnoticed. There were individual and groups that held competing ideas. There were a certain number of radicals in US/American, for example. Radicals tended to imagine a TOTAL change: revolution. But attempts to make incremental reforms always failed, held back by activist conservatives (Clarence Thomas) who refused to budge on they (their) positions. To cite a relevant example in foreign policy there is of Vietnam, “the Vietnam war,” which is something the present author grew up right in the middle of, basically. This represents the typical foreign policy mistake, in which the U. S. government (or officials thereof) decides unilaterally that it has a right to do what it wants. This is in order to decide the fate of other nations. That is to say, “foreign policy.” The policy was once known as "manifest destiny" (it seems to me like “manifest” means something like: “only a fool could not see this, it is that obvious!”). It does seem related to the attitude certain military officials still have (they cannot do anything domestically -you can’t invade Kansas -but they can do things to entire foreign nations). Do I need to say more here? If this is still the attitude today, then that one didn’t go anywhere. It is intolerable to think that another nation has the right to its own self-determination. Just go back and read the statements by the U. S. foreign policy team at the time — one name I used to hear was “Dean Rusk,” I used hear the name a lot when I was little: a part of the U S. foreign policy atmosphere. Our leaders are as afflicted with this madness as they used to be. We -or they -think we have a perfect right to tell Vietnam what to do, we/they have the right to tell Nicaragua what to do, we/they have the right to tell Afghanistan what to do, etc. While this may be what ‘they’ believe, it is a puzzling ignorance. Although we note and attempt to take stock of the attempts to boss around anybody the U. S. feels like ordering around, we see, to our total shock and dismay, that such attempts do not work in the long-run. It’s not like U. S. dominance is some panacea. They always fail. Gosh — what went wrong? But nothing stops them. They go right ahead.
These foreign policy persons in the U. S. (not “American”) government are committed to a delusion. Once you accept vaccination, you are headed for the same general territory, constantly making mistake after mistake. Do we really want to go there? After the initial acceptance of a premise of vaccines as cure-all, all sorts of other things happen. Again down the slippery slope. Again, enormous resistance will make itself seen.
The medical community made a mistake. They should correct this mistake. But for the medical people making mistakes is not unusual. Medical people are quite good at doing that. Yes, they do that. It is mistaken to believe they cleared it all up, just by some Big Pharma concern notifying them that there is (miracle) vaccine. There we go — making the same mistakes all over (insert at this place lyrics of: “Hard Rain a’Gonna Fall,” and “Where Have all the Flowers Gone?”) How long ago did the people of the given time practice bloodletting? How was that as a medical practice? Probably not so good! I don’t know that it did a lot of good! Of course, what do I know — I am just a layperson. How could a layperson know more than a doctor? This is something you all should ask yourselves. Bloodletting did not work and we don't practice it anymore. Information spreads rapidly in our world, so we could plausibly correct our problems much more quick. But what if the information that is rapidly spreading is wrong?
Thus, one should look into the process by which firstly the idea of "vaccine miracle" gets implanted into the mind. Vaccines, in our world, have come to feel like a pillar of modernism—it’s the modern medical practice!
An incapable government clings to whatever dogmas they may recall. Freedom of thought has ended, and they simply have no idea how to supervise or care for the people. This has been the case ever since. The society s based upon "casino capitalism" and clings to whatever dogmas from the past are floating around out there. They double their bets and go "all in" for COVID vaccination. [edited up to here on 8/25/2023; as for the rest I will let you all see the old version] It is called “vaccine,” but it is also gene medicine since it uses mRNA ("messenger" RNA, which is one of several kinds of RNA used in establishing genetic results in the living being). Dialogue: "How do we handle COVID?" "We can't. We have no plan." "But wait. How’s ‘bout we follow the path of the vaccine.” “We can do that, can’t we?"
I have also mentioned (my recent Substack piece) how the "neoclassical" economics delusion is a similar delusion preceding the present delusions. The delusion I am focusing on now is the vaccine one. The point I want to bring home in this piece is that, after an initial phase that hails the "miracle cures," or "miracle vaccines," in the next phase the madness deepens. First, the wrong view (delusion) gets established, this happens over several generations. There is this basic idea of vaccines being this total miracle. Then, people apparently hang on. They don’t correct it. Of course, ultimately they think their lives are being saved. Vaccines will not do that. Maybe it will kill them, I don’t know. They will no longer see the problem. They now go headlong into the slaughter — just like a fanatical army might. All fall down.
I think we have to understand that the problem is that the Democrats do not know how to handle the country they are in charge of. What is left? Well, they still have the gimmicks and innovations they like. Both the liberals and the scientists tend to like all things bright and shiny. And they like the history of all the new things. Vaccines are bright and shiny, and fit a dogma that has been around for awhile. This is the dogma of the "miracle cure." If the anti-vassers do not refute the dogma, it becomes a fixture. Well, at least they tried.
In a starring role, you now have a novel substance that is injected under the skin, blindly believed in, and could turn out, as seems to be the case, to be much worse than earlier substances touted as vaccines (since it is completely new technology), and you have an epidemic that is big enough to be a "pandemic."
Are old ideas about vaccines now challenged—? ~ or are the old ideas trotted out from the skeleton closet and put into extended play? It looks like we have chosen the latter.
Total acceptance of vaccines (the vaccine narrative) occurs between about the 1930's and the 1960's. It is not just the liberals. Medical technology and political liberalism join hands here to create a national myth. Despite ongoing debate, which is to say between right and left factions in America, most everyone believes in the miracle cures. The vaccine is one of the main miracle cures.
What happens is that soon after the COVID outbreak, persons in government learn that a vaccine is in the works. Yea! It is to cover up their administrative failure and a general political incompetence, or inability to care for the country, that they launch a big vaccination promotion campaign. Implicitly, the idea that here is the answer to the problems everybody has. We are dying from COVID-19. There may be other nuances, other details, but this is what I can understand.
Biden can be a tough guy. He warns the public: "our patience [with those who refuse vaccination—the resisters] is wearing thin." I believe they got sixty or seventy per cent of US/America vaccinated. Now the reports of side effects to this untested drug begin to come in.
How long will they refuse to face fact? How long before they accept the truth?
The death toll from COVID-19 was reportedly a million; that is the number I know. Now I cannot imagine how many will need to die from the vaccine, and what is the cure for the vaccine? Another vaccine?
"In this book may be found a central philosophy rooted in American history and ideals… ...ultimate goal of American policy is a world-wide victory for freedom."
~Ernest K. Lindley [Internet Archive]
In the VIETNAM era, 1965, and from a book about Sec. of State Dean Rusk


Charges and countercharges regarding pro and anti-vaccine stances are, from my point of view, unsubstantiated because there is still no hard evidence to show that either are based on fact, merely speculation.
From my personal experience, as a senior citizen with an immune-compromised system I was willing to try the vaccine. It didn’t prevent me from contracting COVID, however. I pointed this out to a vaccine advocate whose reply was that it prevented me from getting it serious case of it.
I find fault with that ‘logic’ in that you can never prove a negative. How would I ever know that I had escaped a more virulent form of it? It’s entirely hypothetical and, frankly, air-headed in its approach.
On the other hand saying that vaccines of RNA derivatives will lead to unexpected and serious side effects is just as wrong. Since we know of no instances where such reactions have occurred we fail into the same faulty logic - How can we prove something that so far hasn’t happened?