Through with them

Jacob and the "gays"

My recent post has engendered some controversy. Yes, I respond, to this person. “Is this about objective bodies, or subjective desire”? This is the question you ask.
Yes. Desire; yes. I am talking about that .That is to say sexual desire. Okay, but we need to call a full stop here. Sexuality is very personal. One should not inquire where one is not s’pposed to go.

I think we are weak here and I think this generation of people are flawed because, man, I think dat…. dey is alwaYz getting into each others’ business. They are men and women. That is “body type,” objective body factuals that you can manipulate in sex like knobs — sort of like turning knobs, turning on your partner. All of which we seem to find rather. . .Hmmmm… …. Well, there is the desire.

So one SHOULD be able to be [with?] anybody one likes, and one SHOULD be able to desire another, and so we need to address both bodies and desires.

We need to talk about body type (morphology) but also the desire, persons liking each other. They like one another.

Now, whom do you like when you are having sex? You like either a male sex body or a female one. And these are different—they are morphologically different, very much so. The biology is different and some of the hormones and so on.

But what is it you like? It is the sex you like Not the morphology but the feeling of liking that, the enjoyment factor.

So we don’t want to go there because it is private. Do you dig that; do you feel me?

So, leave them alone with they perverted little desires but how would a mere body type be implicated in anything objectionable? Where is the offense here? What are the TRANS people, the activists, these victims and accusers—actually doing wrong? Or is it that they just normal pure ones, just innocent “trans” folks—?

No, these people are nefarious and they are the ones trying to get into your life. And they are bothering you and not the other way around. They do that by claiming “victim’s rights” under left-wing ideology. Just as a man says “I AM a woman!” (&calls it “identity”), the person can also displace another person outside of his own doubled identity, the two persona-people the trans individual takes on. They are not “really” one or the other but both of these two “personas.” Imposing one gender on another and then imposing that on another person altogether but claiming to be victimized.

This is self-serving. They separate firstly from their own alter-ego or other-sexed version of themselves and, secondly, from the object of their aggression. That “object,” as I put it is another being, another human.

So it is idea of: “let’s get somebody,” “let’s hurt something,” “how can I hurt another person?” Is that good? Is that something that sounds noble?

So they must be like sort of two people. One is playing off of the other one. The person knows that he or she is not fully a (insert other sex).

….a blank space.

YOU are. They want to victimize you

I am through with these people. . .