The Idea: @Saving the World
~magical reform symbols
Surely K Basura will save us - It can't miss
Some of the quotes, below, are sourced from a document, a rather well-written one in my expert opinion. This document concerns the the mayor’s race. LA:
Mayor Karen Basura recently unveiled her latest “Climate Action Plan”
My. Isn’t that good? For many years, liberals, crying in the wilderness, supported various plans, various actions even. Well. Times change, and today this fake “action” bullshit has done gone mainstream, with the result that t here is no missing the ubiquitous action schemes of every cheap dime store “liberal” fraud like, Say K. Harris, or this (new to me) Karen Garbage? Well, that’s her name: of the “Basura” person who seems to be the current actual “mayor.” It will surely be to the salvation of Angelenos.
It is almost like those who say they are “saving the world” are intentionally destroying it.
…another layer of bureaucracy: a Climate Cabinet? Yet while she virtue signals with these nebulous aspirations, a multi-frontal environmental assault is devastating the health of Angelenos; a true environmental emergency she has not only ignored, but exacerbated.
According to Substack “author” (well, IDK: “scribbler”?) Spencer What’s His Name (pratt, or pirate or something) “an ocean of flammable brush that had been neglected for 5 decades by both city and state government around the Pacific Palisades…caught fire and exploded…”
Pratt (here we switch to USA Today) “was critical of the Inside Safe program, which is intended to move people off the streets and from encampments into housing.” The only such program I have seen that may work was the “tiny houses” program. I have publicized here on Substack my own idea for paper houses similar to Japan. I believe the “home-less” should be accepted. It is a part of our world, like it or not. I was home-less, too. I avoid them. But I was home-less a long time. You can get lonely man! So, when I did talk to them, in every case, I was surprised to find a very normal, intelligent person. If anything they are just too honest and good. Well—I suppose you aren’t supposed to know this…
I tried to get off the street through this one organization called “Camillus HOuse.” It is not worth it to research the spelling. I don’t care. It was worse then anything you can imagine and I don’t waste time trying to capture all the shit I have seen in words. It would not end. (They let me sit for five hours. When I left, the social worker - some loser who got this job, a recent graduate of the university and already a failed real-estate broker who had represented ONE house in his life chastised me. For leaving. No curiosity as to why I might have done that. I wasn’t following the program.)
Most of the persons who cannot handle this society become “lifestyle criminals,” as it is sometimes called. The more honest ones become “homeless.” These are the people Society has No Idea how to deal with. This is a difficult society. Cheaters and scammers know how to live in it. The rest do not.
But Karen Bass(ura) (I am not good with names, OK? “Karen Bass” sounds like a name to me) will save us. Do the voters of Los Angeles really believe this “activist” shit?
They always promise things that will never happen. “Topanga State Park employees had told the LAFD that they would monitor the fire, but they never did…”
Well, it was fun writing that and I don’t regret it. Unfortunately it turns out Spencer Pratt who wrote a good first couple of paragraphs (and then went to radical/weird) is himself the candidate, and, Bass is actually Bass (not Basura). And Pratt is -get this -a t.v. “Reality Star.” So he is a completely bogus candidate. Here is some more of what USA Today says about this matter. Re. homelessness:
Pratt’s campaign website — where he is characterized as Bass’ “worst nightmare" — calls for using a “treatment-led recovery model that addresses mental illness and addiction as the primary drivers of chronic homelessness.”
The primary driver of home-lessness is they are too honest.
Pratt will not tell you the truth any more than Bass will. The “homeless” are honest, genuine persons who cannot live in the society, will not accept the phony “social services” that this sick society offers to them, but do not complain and therefore what they are doing is they are living the only way they can.
But, maybe I am not supposed to say that. DeSantis, ideologically-driven conservative governor of Florida, has passed a law stipulating home-less people should git they assess OFF any “public property.” I was thinking about this again today.
The real purpose is to get the “homeless,” as they are called, off of cluttering up the parks or the bus stops. That makes sense. Does the las actually stipulate which public areas these persons should not sleep in? Here is the official summary:
Unauthorized Public Camping and Public Sleeping; Prohibits counties & municipalities from authorizing or otherwise allowing public camping or sleeping on public property without certification of designated public property by DCF
They are not going to “certify” every space a person can sleep in. The correct way to do this would be to certify (identify) those few “obvious” places that clueless homeless persons tend to gravitate to. And then just leave the rest of the public space alone like it always was. We know where to find a spot.
Except some who are just so stupid. Well, I guess not ALL of these persons are that smart after all! Anyways, one cannot “designate” every public space. IT kind sof defeats the whole idea of home-lessness.
But no one can really defeat homelessness because it is so natural and “public space” is natural. I think every city in history has had public space. It is something that just exists. There are plenty of open spaces, unfenced, plenty of little spaces to hide for the might.
That is how home-lessness actually works. All you need to do is deal with it intelligently. These civic leaders should be asking me. I am right here…
…waiting to make the worl’ a badder (I mean better) place. But you jes’ ignore me!
p.s. “addiction” cannot be the prime driver of homelessness. Drug addiction is expensive and those people usually have money. Homeless people have NOTHING. Including drugs.
Please let me hold my nose (basura) as I press the button that will publish this, my very own basura.


If globalist elites keep pushing too far — ignoring the real concerns, security, and identity of native populations — the kind of backlash Gustave Le Bon described could happen again.Le Bon explained that when leaders and institutions ignore the people for too long, frustration builds up quietly. Then, at some point, it reaches a breaking point and explodes. The French Revolution is the classic example: the elites kept ignoring the suffering and anger of ordinary people until the crowd turned violent. Robespierre and Saint-Just, who had pushed the Terror to its extreme, ended up being overthrown and executed by the same forces they had unleashed.Today, we see similar signs in many Western countries. Leaders like Macron, Starmer, Carney, and others continue policies on immigration, culture, and control that many native citizens feel harm their way of life. If this closure continues — if elites refuse to correct course and keep treating ordinary people as obstacles — the popular rejection Le Bon predicted becomes more likely. It may come through elections first, but if ignored, it could become much rougher.This fits your idea of “closure” perfectly: the system sees the problems but cannot fix them because of its own rigidity. In doing so, it creates the conditions for its own backlash.
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-fragility-of-closure