Old and New Capitalism
~ they snuck it all in under the name of democracy
All businessmen follow the same plan
All businessmen follow the same plan or have the same method. I am not forcing you to believe me but I have the right to my opinion. The method I am talking about is when they entice persons to make life something that is easy. We don’t usually hear about this, which does not mean it isn’t happening. So now persons become stupid. They never make the effort. They just go buy something.
The seller is satisfied that the buyer will be no problem and that the buyer will stay stupid. You get a huge mass of stupid persons. In this manner, the unscrupulous businessman can make the whole population stupid and passive. On top of this is the fact that the Unite States was conceived as people-friendly.
Without any prompting whatsoever the public thinks those companies are nice! Once we have the idea that “all men are equal” and have the right to “life, liberty, and...” (whatever else is supposed to go there), the buyers think that the products the company is selling them are nice!
Under this system, rich persons get to be numero uno—they are just like the old members of the aristocracy were at one time. It is not good
Instead of living according to the intentions or our esteemed founders (who wanted us to become a group of educated yeoman voters — or I’m sorry, farmers or whatever it was) they fall for a trick, one that is played on them by a group of individual persons trying to make money. Not “yeoman famers” by a long shot, but rather competitive monopolists, each one richer than the last.
There is a lesson here. Whatever is ostensibly promoted -in public -is just as likely to be one thing as the other. It is as likely to be a total fraud/deception as to be accurate. And thus, we cannot depend on documents. We can never depend on documents alone. Being a social person is being a member of a society, and this does not involve signing something. It involves being a person, a living person.
Documents and contracts are the vehicles of corruption, or deceit. There are old documents that some scholars research, which involve the domination of Euros over Amer-Indians. In these documents the Europeans try to make plausible acts that take an entire society, turning it over to the invaders, pushing those left on these lands aside (perhaps into the interior.) The are those who originally inhabited the “discovered” lands. That pretty well exposes the corruption of this dependence on documents and contracts in general, something the Europeans obviously have no right to impose on other ethnic groups in the as yet undiscovered land.
The substances injected into persons are also a domination, and a worse violation than the other one was. The substances, injected into a person under the formal designation “vaccines,” cause a variety of adverse responses. From what I have learned, through underground reporting here on Substack, the method for getting these substances into the blood (under the skin) of the society was to employ a legal process. This consists of documentation, language, and law. There are specific laws, e.g. the PREP act or EUA. This was themethod that provided a gateway for the adverse reactions that followed and that involve a substantial portion of the population of the round earth.
They were going for a specific result. Why use documents to get it? Well, it is because they were mentally dead people that they need a special means of delivery of harm. The American violence is done by means of documents, under the guise of documents and formal language.
If something seems important— then I write it down
Democracy facilitated capitalism. Over time, capitalism generates monopoly and concentration of wealth—in the very few or at most maybe the 1%. But, yes, the method was democracy.
At some point, democracy requires that capitalism evolve. Capitalism creates business tychoons but democracy has to win. If democracy is the basic principle, then it will eventually uproot the tychoons.
Under the old system rich persons we able to be the top persons as the successors to the old aristocracy. That phase of capitalism is temporary. No way to continue it. Sacrificing democracy won’t help either.
Opposition to “intervention” is an intervention.
Once they succeed to hold back much of the “intervention,” they then drive themselves crazy. Competition becomes psychopathological. The president considers everything he does “big” and “beautiful.” He is showing us the mind of the new aristocrat.
The hideous results include, for example, the influence of the pharma industry upon doctors and medicine. Priorities invert.
One wonders whether there were ever any “wonder drugs” at all of if it was all a scam from the beginning.
When you inject their drugs, the stock market value of Moderna goes up.
Instead of being seen as hideous, “opposition to intervention” is promoted as “good for the economy.”
How do you feel about intervention now?
The debate over regulation is central to economics thought and was activel discussed for generations.
In America, the theme is friendliness. When commerce is added to the mix we get a new aristocracy. But now you have a president who is not your friend. Does he sound like he is? His main personality characteristic is he likes to hurt people.
How can he be a friend when he turns on people whenever he feels like it? Sometimes businesses advertise themselves as “friendly.” That doesn’t make it true. In most cases—? ~ it’s all fake...
It’s a complete lie. Trump does not even try. He never goes around pretending to be friendly. Friendliness? He doesn’t have any. No, but that is what makes the system run.
And Trupp don’t care.